🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.